Dedicated to Quality and excellence
Publication Ethics:
Uniform Requirements for Manuscripts Submitted to BioIT Journals:
Content on this site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
Indexed In:
Open J-Gate
Cabell's Directories
ISI Journals
John Hopkins Lib.
New Jour
Journal Policy and Ethics:

Our Open Access journals maintain the highest standards of peer review while increasing the efficiency of the process.

All research articles published in our journal undergo full peer review, key characteristics of which are listed below:

  • All research articles are reviewed by at least two qualified experts.
  • All publication decisions are made by the journals' Editors-in-Chief on the basis of the reviews provided
  • Members of the international Editorial Boards lend insight, advice and guidance to the Editors-in-Chief generally and to assist decision making on specific submissions
  • Editorial Assistants provide the administrative support that allows BioIT Open Access journals to maintain the integrity of peer review while delivering rapid turnaround and maximum efficiency to authors, reviewers and editors alike.
  • BioIT Open Access journals additionally benefit through the manuscript referral process from the high quality peer review conducted by established journals.

Originality and plagiarism: The authors should ensure that they have written entirely original works, and if the authors have used the work and/or words of others, that this has been appropriately cited or quoted.

Acknowledgement of sources: Proper acknowledgment of the work of others must always be given.

Disclosure and conflicts of interest: All submissions must include disclosure of all relationships that could be viewed as presenting a potential conflict of interest.

Peer review of referred papers:
Editors of our Open Access journals will decide promptly whether to accept, reject, or request revisions of referred papers based on the reviews and editorial insight of the supporting journals. In addition, Editors will have the option of seeking additional reviews when needed. Authors will be advised when Editors decide further review is needed.

Peer review of novel submissions:
1. Authors submit an Manuscript.
2. The Editor-in-chief verifies relevance of the Manuscript to the journal's policy for publishing.
4. If Manuscript have the merits of journal's Scope, the Editor-in-chief will assign the two reviewers, who are expert in respective field. IJABR follows Double blind Review process.
5. Reviewer'r comment will be sent to the Associate editor, whether Manuscript Need modification, Rejection or Accepted. This message will forward to Authors also.
6.  If Manuscript accepted by reviewrs, Acceptance will be sent to the author, after galley proof approved by the Author then Manuscript will be in queue for publication.
6. If modification asked by the reviwer, The author/s should respond in due time and clarify ambiguities if any.
7. Upon receiving the revised Manuscript, the reviewers will check the author/s modified Manuscript.
8. If modified/revised paper Manuscript by the reviewer, the acceptance will be sent to the author, after galley proof approved by Author then Manuscript will be in queue for publication.

Withdrawal of Manuscripts
Authors are not allowed to withdraw submitted manuscripts, because the withdrawals are waste of valuable resources that editors and referees spent a great deal of time processing submitted manuscript, money and works invested by the publisher.
However, it is unethical to withdraw a submitted manuscripts from one journal if accepted by another journal. Withdrawal of manuscripts are only allowed after withdrawal request has been made to the Publisher.
In case of fraudulent submission, Withdrawn means that the article content (HTML and PDF) is removed and replaced with a HTML page and PDF simply stating that the article has been withdrawn according to the journal Policy on Article in Press Withdrawal with a link to the current policy document.

Use of patient images or case details: Studies on patients or volunteers require ethics committee approval and informed consent, which should be documented in the paper.

Hazards and Human or Animal Subjects
If the work involves chemicals, procedures or equipment that have any unusual hazards inherent in their use, the author must clearly identify these in the manuscript.

Fundamental errors in published works
When an author discovers a significant error or inaccuracy in his/her own published work, it is the author's obligation to promptly notify the journal editor or publisher and cooperate with the editor to retract or correct the paper.

There are no submission charges. The paid publication fee will not refunded at any stage.

See also the National Library of Medicine's policy on retractions and the recommendations of the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) concerning corrections and retractions.